U.S. government joins suit against Caremark Rx
Compliance Monitor, June 1, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
The federal government has joined a lawsuit against Caremark Rx in an effort to recoup funds it believes the pharmacy benefits manager owes the Medicaid program, according to a May 27 report on TheStreet.com.
The government is joining a whistleblower suit that already included Texas, Tennessee, Florida, and Arkansas, TheStreet.com reported. The feds claim that Caremark "engaged in an unlawful scheme over many years," billing Medicaid for drugs it should have covered itself. The U.S. and the four states are seeking repayment of an undisclosed amount of money.
"We intend to send Caremark a past-due bill for its conduct," said Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott on TheStreet.com. "This company schemed to avoid responsibility for its healthcare obligations to members who were paying premiums. Instead, it opted to let the Medicaid program--and Texas taxpayers--cover expenditures it should have covered on behalf of those already insured under its plan."
According to TheStreet, pharmacy benefit managers' failure to repay Medicaid for drugs they should have covered has been a growing problem for years, now totaling hundreds of millions of dollars annually. The False Claims Act allows the government to seek retribution from Caremark that equals three times the company's portion of the bills.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Do not code 57288 with 52000
- Searched
