GOV’T AUDIT INSIDER: PA nursing facility falls short in staffing regulations compliance
Healthcare Auditing Weekly, June 21, 2005
Beverly Healthcare of Reading, PA, complied with federal staffing laws and regulations, but did not comply with state staffing requirements, according to an OIG review of 92 direct care employees. Beverly did not obtain a current Pennsylvania state police background check for four direct-care employees, did not obtain the background checks for 13 direct-care employees within the required timeframes, and did not schedule sufficient staff to provide the required 2.7 hours of direct care per resident per day for seven of the days reviewed.
The OIG recommends that Beverly restrict the four direct-care employees from working directly with the residents until it obtains valid background checks; review and strengthen its internal controls and prohibit new employees from working directly with residents if the background checks are not received within the required timeframes. The office also recommends Beverly schedule direct-care employees and ensure that there is enough nursing staff on duty to provide 2.7 hours of direct-care per resident per day.
During the audit, the OIG did the following:
Click here to read the audit report, "Review of Nursing Facility Staffing Requirements at Beverly Healthcare of Reading," (A-07-04-04031), issued May 18.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Do not code 57288 with 52000
- Searched
