New auditors contracted by CMS will get a percentage of findings
Health Care Auditing Strategies, May 1, 2005
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login.
CMS promises strong oversight of auditors' discoveries
Scrutinizing thousands of Medicare claims forms would be a daunting task. However, receiving a cut of any overpayment findings would likely sweeten the challenge.
This month, contracted auditors in Florida, New York, and California will begin reviewing thousands of year-old Medicare claims forms filed by healthcare providers in their states. Unlike other contracted Medicare claims checkers, they will receive a percentage of the overpayments they discover.
CMS has hired recovery audit contractors (RAC) as part of a three-year pilot program/demonstration aimed at adding more scrutiny to the Medicare claims process. The program also charges investigators with finding underpayments, but it will not offer the same financial incentive for those findings. The percent of overpayment findings each auditor receives varies by contract.
Critics say the carrot aspect of the RAC program doesn't sit well.
"I think it's a matter of concern because there is an incentive for the auditors to find problems and there may be a tendency to overreach a bit," says Susan V. Kayser, Esq., a partner at Duane Morris, LLP, of New York City.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Do not code 57288 with 52000
- Searched
