BCBS, FBI team up to bring down alleged $1 billion fraud ring
Compliance Monitor, March 16, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
A collaboration involving 12 Blue Cross and Blue Shield (BCBS) plans and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) broke up a scheme under which physicians allegedly filed more than $1 billion in fraudulent claims, The New York Times reported March 12.
Daniel M. Martino, acting chief of the FBI's health fraud unit, told the Times that the scheme involved recruiters drawing patients from 47 states to clinics in southern California, resulting in fraudulent bills totaling more than $1.3 billion and losses to employers and insurers of more than $350 million. Clinics allegedly paid recruiters $2,000 to $4,000 for each patient who received a medical procedure. Patients also allegedly received inducements in the form of cash or discounts on cosmetic surgery.
As a result of the collaboration's findings, the BCBS plans involved filed a civil suit that names nine surgery clinics, 21 physicians, and 13 clinic owners, employees, and administrators, the Times reported. In addition, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Orange County, CA, district attorney's office filed criminal charges.
According to the Times, a few red flags alerted insurers to the alleged fraud, Martino said, including when "50 people from Boston arrived in Southern California in a three-week period and filed claims for colonoscopies performed every other day." The BCBS plans in their lawsuit echoed Martino's sentiment saying they were surprised to see "clusters of employees from the same workplace" going to California for the same treatments.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Do not code 57288 with 52000
- Searched
