FL suit alleges Tenet took $1 billion in improper reimbursement
Compliance Monitor, March 9, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
The state of Florida on March 2 filed a lawsuit against Tenet Healthcare Corp. charging the nation's second-largest for-profit hospital operator with racketeering while alleging a scheme that brought in $1 billion in improper Medicare payments, Reuters reported.
According to the lawsuit, filed in the Miami-based U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Tenet ran a billing scheme that not only benefitted its operations, but also prevented public hospitals from obtaining millions of Medicare dollars.
Tenet billing practices have been under government scrutiny since 2002, Reuters reported, a fact that a company spokesperson says influenced the suit. "This appears to be a lawsuit motivated by a number of our Florida competitors and critics," Tenet spokesperson Steven Campanini said. "It is specious and unwarranted. We will vigorously defend ourselves against these charges."
The suit claims that Tenet inflated its bills to the extent that it raised the threshold at which hospitals could make claims from Medicare's Outlier Pool. This process kept other facilities from getting their just reimbursement, the state alleges.
"The evidence will show that Tenet gamed the system to enhance its profit margin at the expense of public hospitals," Florida Attorney General Charlie Crist said in a statement. Thirteen Florida hospitals joined the state in filing this suit. The plaintiffs will be seeking damages in the millions of dollars, Crist said, which could be tripled under racketeering statutes, Reuters reported.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Do not code 57288 with 52000
- Searched
