Ongoing therapy
Compliance Monitor, March 4, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Q: CMS regulations require patients who are receiving physical therapy to be seen by their physicians every 30 days to validate the need for ongoing therapy. If the requirement is not met, the services are considered not covered. Is the hospital outpatient therapy department responsible for verifying that the patient is seen every 30 days? If yes, how do outpatient departments manage to monitor this requirement? Would it be appropriate to obtain an ABN in these situations?
A: It is the responsibility of the provider (e.g., hospital or outpatient clinic) to ensure that a physician or nonphysician provider has certified an initial plan of care and recertified the continued medical necessity for therapy services provided to a Medicare beneficiary every 30 days, as necessary.
One way to track the certification/recertification process is for the therapy provider to establish a log of when the request for cert/recert is sent to the physician's office. Assign a staff person who can ensure that the signed cert/recert has been returned by the physician in a reasonable time frame (two weeks is usually viewed as reasonable by the fiscal intermediary). The staff person would also be responsible for following up with the physician's office, as necessary, to ensure that the signed form is received.
In situations where you do not expect Medicare to deny payment for a service, an advanced beneficiary notice (ABN) should not be given to the patient. For further guidelines on the use of the ABN, visit CMS on the Web.
This question was answered by Mike Megill, Director, ZA Consulting, Jenkintown, PA.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
