OIG issues supplemental compliance program guidance for hospitals
Compliance Monitor, February 2, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) on January 27 announced an update to its voluntary compliance program guidance for hospitals with a supplement that focuses on measuring and improving the efficacy of compliance programs and identifies fraud and abuse risk areas for hospitals.
A draft of this document, titled "OIG Supplemental Compliance Program Guidance for Hospitals," was first announced in June. The final version was officially published in the January 31 Federal Register.
The new material serves as a complement to 1998's voluntary compliance program, which was designed to establish a foundation for effective voluntary compliance programs in hospitals.
"It seems that the OIG has gone beyond its initial purview in publishing this compliance guidance," says Bruce D. Armon, Esq., a partner in the Life Sciences group of Philadelphia-based Saul Ewing LLP. "They're moving from what an effective compliance program should include to now measuring and improving how an effective compliance program should operate."
According to HHS, this guidance covers the following risk areas:
The final document is the product of two Federal Register notices and recommendations made during subsequent public comment periods. According to an HHS release, the public produced "a large number of recommendations, primarily addressing fraud and abuse risk areas, and many were incorporated into the final version of the document."
To read "OIG Supplemental Compliance Program Guidance for Hospitals," click here.
Stay tuned to Strategies for Health Care Compliance for more coverage on this hot topic.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
