Johnson & Johnson recalls potentially defective stents
Compliance Monitor, January 19, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Admitting it is taking a "conservative" approach, Johnson & Johnson last week voluntarily recalled 300 Cypher heart stents after an audit revealed six of the stents were not up to manufacturing specifications, The New York Times reported January 14.
According to the Times, the stents were shipped from a manufacturing plant in Puerto Rico to 145 hospitals in December. Johnson & Johnson had not confirmed whether any of the stents--drug-coated cylinders used to prop open blood vessels that have been cleared of blockages--had been inserted into any patients.
Despite this uncertainty, the company remained confident that there would be no negative health consequences if a patient received one of the stents. According to the report, the detected defect was that the polymer coating on the six stents in question did not meet specifications. However, every stent had the appropriate amount of sirolimus, which is "a drug that seeps into vessel walls to combat their tendency to form new blockages," the Times reported.
The Times also reported that this is not the first problem for the Puerto Rico plant that manufactured the stents. The facility was cited in 2004 by the Food and Drug Administration for violating manufacturing standards.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
