Pharmaceutical manufacturer adds $1.275 billion to settlement fund
Compliance Monitor, January 11, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals lent its support this week to an additional settlement fund designed to compensate thousands of people who took the fen-phen diet drug combination, the Associated Press (AP) reported January 10.
By not rejecting the the change in the original settlement, Wyeth will add an additional $1.275 billion to the original $3.75 billion settlement fund, offering "swifter, but possibly lower payouts" in a class-action setup, rather than tying up the courts by enduring individual lawsuits, the AP reported.
"The proposed amendment ensures that the large majority of class members who have less serious claims will recieve compensation on a streamlined basis," Wyeth senior vice president and general counsel Lawrence V. Stein told the AP. "It also would help resolve much of the uncertainty that has surrounded the diet drug settlement--for both class members and for Wyeth."
The revision to the original settlement adds funds for about 400,000 people who suffered non-life-threatening heart valve damage after taking fen-phen. The manufacturer initially set aside $17 billion to cover fen-phen-related legal matters, of which $3 billion remains, the AP reported.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
