Medical supply firm owners indicted in power wheelchair fraud ring
Compliance Monitor, December 29, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Three medical supply company owners were named in a federal grand jury's 43-count indictment last week that charges them with bilking Medicare out of more than $27 million through false billing for power wheelchairs, the Associated Press (AP) reported.
These latest indictments are part of a Government Accountability Office (GAO) program designed to bring down an alleged fraud ring involving power wheelchairs that has been operating throughout the southern and southwestern United States, the AP reports.
According to the jury's filing, the three owners-Anikeme B. Akpabot of Mesquite, TX; Okon Eyo Idiong of Southfield, MI; and Aniefiok Jimmy Eking of Houston-solicited patients and found physicians to obtain certificates of medical need, which are essential to Medicare's coverage of power wheelchairs.
Akpabot had already been indicted in February under the GAO's "Operation Roll Over." The new 43-count indictment includes Idiong and Eking for the first time and adds the charges of conspiracy and money laundering to what Akpabot previously faced, the AP reported.
Medicare pays approximately $5,000 for each power wheelchair it covers; it spent approximately $1 billion in 2003 covering them. Disproportionate coverage rates in the Houston area first alerted the government to a potential problem. A GAO official told the AP that 14% of Medicare's power wheelchair spending went to people in the Houston area even though only 1% of Medicare beneficiaries lived there.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
