Medco under the federal microscope for potential anti-kickback violations
Compliance Monitor, December 8, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Federal prosecutors are examining payments that pharmacy benefit management company Medco Health Solutions Inc. made to a health insurer to see if it violated anti-kickback laws, according to court filings reported in a December 3 Associated Press (AP) story.
The examination is a response to a 1998 deal in which Medco agreed to pay UnitedHealth Group Inc. for medical data the insurer had collected. At the time, Medco was trying to win a contract to manage the medication needs of UnitedHealth's clients, AP reported.
In a court filing in late November, federal prosecutors in Philadelphia said they had already deposed one UnitedHealth executive about the deal, and asked a judge for more time to depose a second, saying he was "the most knowledgeable individual of Medco's offer of a kickback in excess of $200 million."
A Medco spokeswoman would not speak about the arrangement in detail, but denied that it was improper, AP reported.
UnitedHealth Group spokesman Mark Lindsay told AP the company's contract with Medco was the result of "good-faith, arms-length, and often hard-fought negotiations."
In a civil lawsuit, the U.S. Attorney accused Medco of destroying mail-order prescriptions to avoid paying late penalties when it couldn't fill them in time and improperly inducing physicians to switch the drugs their patients were taking.
The suit also accused Medco of giving an illegal $87.4 million kickback to insurer Oxford Health Plans Inc., which agreed to merge with UnitedHealth in April.
Medco denied all charges, AP reported.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Case Management Monthly, March 2012
- Searched
