GOV’T AUDIT INSIDER: Missing documentation in Colorado
Healthcare Auditing Weekly, November 9, 2004
Missing documentation in Colorado
The OIG was unable to determine whether Colorado's 2003 Medicaid enhanced payment was correct because Colorado could not locate documentation verifying the initial Medicare base rates used for calculating the inpatient hospital rate. The OIG review showed that Colorado did follow federal and state laws for calculating upper payment limit (UPL) payments. The OIG says Colorado should keep all needed documentation for a minimum of four years. During the audit, the OIG did the following:
Click here to read the audit report, "Review of Colorado Upper Payment Limit Requirements for Colorado," (A-07-03-02673), issued October 5.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
