Tip: The impact of CMS change request 3444
Compliance Monitor, October 13, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
A recent addition to CMS policy regarding changing inpatient admissions to observation (outpatient) status could have a significant effect on hospital reimbursement if the requirements are not immediately addressed.
I'm referring to CMS's September 10 transmittal 19, change request 3444.
CMS now requires that you establish the patient's status (inpatient or outpatient) prior to discharge. In addition, when you classify patients as either an "outpatient" or "observation," give them an Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) to inform them that they will be liable for payment of non-covered services under Medicare Part B.
This change means it's important for you to do concurrent review and determinations of patient status based on medical necessity criteria and prudent medical judgment.
In CMS transmittal 19, there are four conditions you must meet in order for the hospital to submit an outpatient claim after changing certification from inpatient to observation:
1. The change in patient status from inpatient to outpatient is made prior to discharge or release, while the beneficiary is still a patient of the hospital
2. The hospital has not submitted a claim to Medicare for the inpatient admission
3. A physician concurs with the utilization review committee's decision
4. The physician's concurrence with the utilization review committee's decision is documented in the patient's medical record
Short stays comprise anywhere from 10%-20% of hospital admissions. The new CMS guidelines make it clear that hospitals can no longer retrospectively reclassify patient status in these cases.
Hospitals must hold concurrent review by a nurse trained in clinical guidelines. A physician adviser trained in medical necessity guidelines and experienced as a clinician should be the back up. NOTE: The guidelines require concurrence by "a physician," but not necessarily the attending physician.
Some hospitals have chosen to outsource this service to ensure complete, 24-hour a day coverage and consistent expertise. Whether you choose to outsource or build your own methodology, you must be prepared since the regulations took effect October 12.
This tip was written by Joseph Zebrowitz, MD (jzebrowitz@ehrdocs.com), executive vice president and senior medical director, and Mark Miani, MD (mmiani@ehrdocs.com), senior medical director, Executive Health Resources, Drexel Hill, PA.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
