GAO reports barriers in future of healthcare IT
Compliance Monitor, August 18, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Stark and anti-kickback laws present barriers to healthcare information technology (IT), according to the General Accountability Office's (GAO) August 13 report.
The laws prohibit adoption of health IT initiatives, the report said, because healthcare professionals are not sure whether their arrangements and solutions open the door to violations of these laws.
The GAO interviewed several experts, who cited several laws that impede IT progress in healthcare, including those that involve fraud and abuse, antitrust, federal income tax, intellectual property, malpractice, and state licensing.
"Because the laws frequently do not address health IT arrangements directly, healthcare providers are uncertain about what would constitute violations of the laws or [what would] create a risk of litigation," according to the report.
Healthcare providers are reluctant to make significant investments in healthcare IT because they cannot predict the legal consequences of doing so.
"In the area of fraud and abuse, for example, both the Physician Self-Referral (Stark) Law and the Anti-kickback Law present barriers," the report said. Together, these laws make it more difficult for providers to establish IT arrangements and share IT resources.
To read the report, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
