CMS encourages use of HIPAA-compliant electronic claims
Compliance Monitor, July 7, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
As of July 1, electronic Medicare claims that do not meet Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) standards will be treated as paper claims and paid more slowly than HIPAA-compliant electronic claims, said CMS Administrator Mark B. McClellan, MD, PhD.
"The great majority of electronic claims we are receiving meet the required HIPAA standards," McClellan said in a June 30 CMS release, "but for those still not in compliance there is going to be a delay in getting their money. We are hoping this will motivate more filers to get into compliance soon."
Noncompliant electronic claims will still be accepted by Medicare, but their payment will take 13 additional days, according to CMS, which announced a modification to its HIPAA contingency plan in February.
The modification had an effective date of July 1, but CMS said it will begin delaying payments for noncompliant claims submitted on and after July 6.
"By working collaboratively with healthcare providers on the use of standard electronic claims, we've been able to reach 90% compliance," McClellan said. "Now, a two-week payment delay is an important further incentive to get to 100%."
To read the release from CMS, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
