Tenet settlement tag could reach $1 billion
Compliance Monitor, June 16, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
The nation's second-largest for-profit hospital chain could pay more than $1 billion to settle federal investigations of claims that its physicians at Redding Medical Center (CA) performed unnecessary surgeries, according to a June 11 report in the Los Angeles Times.
Tenet Healthcare Corp., based in Santa Barbara, CA, is in preliminary discussions with government officials and lawyers representing more than 750 patients.
Tenet said in the report that talks were proceeding with the government, but that no deals were expected soon.
Government investigators have scrutinized the company's improper Medicare billing and other financial practices. Tenet has already agreed to pay $54 million to settle government allegations that two physicians at Redding performed unnecessary heart surgeries. And in March, Tenet announced that it had agreed to pay $30.75 million to settle an investigation involving a Tenet-owned hospital in Florida and a second nationwide probe.
Financial analysts have estimated that Tenet may eventually pay as much as $1 billion to settle lawsuits as well as federal investigations into areas including Medicare payments and physician relocation arrangements.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
