CMS issues final proposed rule for 2005 inpatient payment increases
Compliance Monitor, May 19, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Acute-care hospitals with a focus on rural facilities are the target of CMS' latest announcement on inpatient payment increases and other payment-policy changes for 2005.
CMS announced its final proposed rule May 12 during a telephone press conference.
According to CMS Administrator Mark B. McClellan, MD, PhD, important provisions in the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 led CMS to implement new steps to improve quality of care and provide additional relief to rural hospitals.
The rule encompasses a wide variety of changes, including
1. updating the labor markets that are used to determine hospital payment rates in fee-for-service, resulting in an increase in payment.
2. Increasing the number of payment improvements, based on a fair market value update for hospitals. CMS will look at 10 proven quality indicators as payment incentives. Hospitals must provide better information about their services to show improved care, McClellan said. "We're linking payment with quality."
3. Changes in wage index that reflect rural, remote hospitals that have a lower number of Medicare discharges.
4. Increasing payments for certain new medical technologies.
5. Provisions for ownership of a hospital-within-a-hospital.
To read the release, which includes a link to the final proposed rule, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
