Gov’t audit insider: Home health reimbursement
Healthcare Auditing Weekly, April 13, 2004
Claims submitted to Cahaba regional home health fiscal intermediary came under Office of Inspector General (OIG) scrutiny, the OIG says in an audit report released March 31. The audit examined reimbursement for beneficiaries who received services 14 days after discharge from inpatient hospitals because home-health patients often receive unnecessarily high levels of service in the first 14 days after discharge, the OIG says.
To uncover such unnecessary services, the OIG performed the following tasks:
- Reviewed appropriate Medicare laws and regulations
- Extracted paid claims that home health agencies (HHAs) submitted with codes pointing to no hospital discharge within 14 days before the home health admission
- Matched the selected claims to data on hospital inpatient stays and determined which beneficiaries received inpatient services
- Calculated overpayments for such beneficiaries
- Asked the fiscal intermediary to perform a similar calculation and compare results
- Discussed the findings of the review with Cahaba officials and provided them with a file containing the population of claims with overpayments
The HHAs under Cahaba's jurisdiction are now a part of its reimbursement lapse. Your fiscal intermediary could be making the same mistake that Cahaba, and it could cost you in the long run.
Click here to view the OIG audit report, "Review of payments made by Cahaba Government Benefit administrators for home health services preceded by a hospital discharge."
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
