Gov’t audit insider: Lessons healthcare auditors can learn from school-based service slip-ups
Healthcare Auditing Weekly, April 6, 2004
Iowa school-based Medicare costs: Lessons healthcare auditors can learn
Iowa must remit more than $650,000 that the state improperly received from Medicare for school-based administrative costs, an Office of Inspector General (OIG) audit reveals. Iowa's school-based program claimed hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal financial participation (FFP) without required matching expenditures, and racked up over $20,000 in inappropriate claims from spreadsheet rounding errors.
Healthcare auditors can learn some lessons from the expensive mistakes and mismanagement surfacing in audits of school-based services. During their investigation, auditors:
- Discussed the role that Iowa program officials played and the programs they facilitated
- Reconciled and reviewed records supporting Iowa's FFP claims
- Performed onsite reviews of several lead agencies and sub-agencies
- Discussed procedures for claims preparation with personnel
- Reviewed supporting documentation for select claims
- Reviewed supporting documentation for the determination of the percentage of Medicaid recipients, for indirect costs, for revenue offsets, and for the use of reimbursed funds
- Examined sampling methodologies for determining costs allocated to Medicaid
- Interviewed lead and sub-agency employees to assess their level of training
The auditors also met with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' regional officials to examine their involvement with the Iowa program. Iowa inadequately monitored the program, and did not properly supervise its lead and sub-agencies, the OIG said. Lack of satisfactory monitoring by Iowa gave the OIG no assurance that the claimed FFP was reasonable, or permissible.
Click here: http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region7/70202099.pdf to view the report called, "Audit of the Iowa Department of Human Services' Claim for Medicaid School-Based Administrative Costs (A-07-02-02099)."
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
