Is it necessary to check for sanctions and exclusions on all employees or just those who work with government programs? And what is the definition of a contractor?
Compliance Monitor, March 5, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Both the United States Sentencing Guidelines and the Office of Inspector General (OIG) Guidelines state that organizations are responsible for their decisions regarding to whom they give discretionary authority and with whom they do business.
Their guidelines strongly advise that organizations screen employees and contractors (contractor includes companies/business partners and their personnel, who supply goods and services including management firms and consultants).
Such screening would ensure that employees and contractors have not been convicted of criminal violations or have not been the subject of sanctions, debarment, exclusion, or other serious adverse action.
Organizations should develop a specific policy, which reflects screening activities on all employees, and involve at a minimum the following checks:
1. Cumulative Sanction Report - OIG
2. General Services Administration Debarment List
3. National Practitioner Databank (for clinicians)
4. A reasonable prudent background check including a reference check.
5. Requirement that employees disclose any criminal conviction or exclusion action.
Having a policy in place which requires the foregoing checks is instrumental in documenting an effective corporate compliance program.
This question was answered by Norman S. Werner, CHE, associate corporate compliance officer, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
