MA health insurer alters procedures for imaging
Compliance Monitor, March 3, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, one of Massachusetts' largest health insurers, said physicians are ordering too many imaging tests, including MRIs and CT scans. As a result, it's returning to a traditional style of managed care to control these soaring costs, reported The Boston Globe on February 27.
Radiology costs at Harvard Pilgrim are skyrocketing, the Globe story stated. Harvard Pilgrim patients had 130,362 advanced imaging tests last year, costing the plan $73 million - a 62 percent increase in two years.
In many cases, it's a question of medical necessity. Harvard Pilgrim executives said some tests, particularly those for lower back pain and headaches, which are advertised heavily, may not be needed. The tests not only increase costs, but expose patients to unnecessary radiation and delay appropriate treatment for ailments that can be diagnosed without imaging, executives said in the Globe story.
Beginning April 15, Harvard Pilgrim will require physicians to approve all non-emergency advanced imaging tests with National Imaging Associates Inc. to evaluate whether the tests meet "nationally-recognized, evidence-based guidelines," the Globe reported.
If a physician schedules a test without calling the New Jersey-based radiology management company, Harvard Pilgrim will not pay and the patient or physician will end up with the bill. Until now, physicians ordered imaging tests themselves.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
