South Carolina hospital pays settlement for violating exclusion list
Compliance Monitor, January 21, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Lexington Medical Center, a 292-bed hospital in West Columbia, SC, agreed last month to pay $99,400 to settle two incidents of submitting claims from excluded providers, according to a January 12 story in Modern Healthcare.
The hospital submitted claims to Medicare for services rendered by employed individuals who had been excluded by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG). The hospital conducted background checks on at least one of the providers, but the results did not surface.
One excluded provider had allegedly illegally submitted $17,000 in claims, while the other allegedly failed to repay student medical loans. The settlement included the amount of claims from both providers as well as penalties.
"A background check was done, but a clerical error was made," said Lexington President and Chief Executive Officer Michael Biediger in the article. "On routine checks later we picked up the exclusions and self-reported to the Inspector General. Since then we've worked with the Inspector General to try to clear things up and move forward."
To read the entire article, click here. Note: Registration is required, but it's free.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
