Hospital must improve cardiac rehabilitation billing
Compliance Monitor, August 27, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
A Wisconsin hospital received approximately $47,247 in improper Medicare payments for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation services. The hospital, Saint Luke's Medical Center (SLMC), tripped up by not supporting patient eligibility for cardiac rehabilitation in the medical records. It also billed multiple units of service for a single cardiac rehabilitation visit, and inadequately documented outpatient cardiac rehabilitation services, according to a recent Office of Inspector General (OIG) audit report.
SLMC also did not designate a physician to directly supervise the services provided by its cardiac rehabilitation program or identify the physician professional services to which the cardiac rehabilitation services were provided "incident to," according to the OIG.
The OIG recommends that SLMC do the following to improve its billing compliance:
To read the audit report "Review of Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation Services at Saint Luke's Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin," click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
