* When may we use the nurse practitioner's UPIN?
* May I withhold access to a patient's medical record because of a past due account?
* Bulletin: OIG targets contractual joint ventures
Compliance Monitor, July 22, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
|
||
| Health Care Auditing Strategies Special Offer |
Learn More about HIPAA Staff Training Handbooks |
Strategies for Health Care Compliance Special Offer |
|
Friday, July 4, 2003 Vol. 6, No. 53 SUBSCRIBE to Compliance Monitor Visit Complianceinfo.com
On Complianceinfo.com The OIG Work Plan for Fiscal Year 2003 Compliance Hot Topics: Billing and Coding, EMTALA, Stark, HIPAA |
Welcome to Compliance Monitor Q&A! Our mission is to answer your difficult compliance questions-and your simple ones, too. To submit a question, send it to Compliance Monitor Q & A editor Laura Motta at lmotta@hcpro.com.
We hope you enjoy this service and we welcome your feedback.
This week's questions
Quick survey Questions and Answers When may we use the nurse practitioner's UPIN? Q: If we receive an order for outpatient services, such as labs or x-rays, and then a nurse practitioner or physician assistant signs it, may we bill Medicare using the nurse practitioner's or physician assistant's Unique Provider Identification Number (UPIN)? A: Based on Medicare regulations, you may either use the physician assistant's or nurse practitioner's UPIN on the CMS-1500 form. Or, you may continue to use the provider number and UPIN of the supervising physician. This rule was established on January 1, 1998. In sections 4511 and 4512 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, lawmakers removed the restriction on the areas and settings Medicare could pay nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and clinical nurse specialists. Determining which provider number and UPIN to use depends on whether the supervising physician is "on-site" during the services. If your organizationuses the physician's provider and UPIN number, but the services were actually performed by a physician assistant, for example, then you must meet the "incident to" guideline. The guidelines requires the supervising physician to be "on-site" and readily available to the non-physician practitioners during these services. If the supervising physician is not on site, but reachable by telephone-this is considered general supervision. In this case, you should bill under the provider and UPIN numbers for the nurse practitioner or physician assistant. But make sure they actually performed the service. As always, proper documentation is paramount to remain in compliance with Medicare regulations. Check with your local carrier as to whether there is a modifier you may use with non-physician practitioner services. As of April 1, 1999, Medicare regulations no longer required modifiers for most services done by nurse practitioners or physician assistants. However, an assistant at surgery still requires a modifier. It is always best to check with your local carrier. This question was answered by Rick Oliver, JD, CHCO, CPC, MT (ASCP), director of compliance at AmeriPath, Inc. Get internal investigations advice from experts Join HCPro for the 90-minute live audioconference, "Internal Investigations: Know the Risks, Reap the Benefits" and gain tools and strategies to conduct efficient, effective, and beneficial internal investigations and self-audits. This program will be presented on Thursday, July 24th, 2003, from 1:00-2:30pm (Eastern). To register or learn more, click here, or call our Customer Service Team at 800/650-6787. Be sure to mention Source Code EZ1285A.
Pay-Per-View article: Bulletin: OIG targets contractual joint ventures The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has renewed its interest in contractual joint venture relationships among providers-especially those who are ancillary vendors, according to a special advisory bulletin published in April. This is the second OIG pronouncement on the joint venture issue. The OIG published its first comment in 1989... Go to "Bulletin: OIG targets contractual joint ventures " for the rest of this article. The cost is $10. Subscribers to the online version of Strategies for Health Care Compliance have free access to this article. Subscribers to the print edition can find it in their July issues. A $30 steal! You can read this article-and much more-in the July issue of Strategies for Health Care Compliance. Your cost: Four stories for only $30! You'll learn strategies for measuring privacy program effectiveness, plus you'll receive a handout to give to physicians about anti-kickback issues. Choose between a PDF or HTML version for just $30. Online subscribers have free access to this issue. Print newsletter subscribers can find it in their mailboxes. Hotly debated and long awaited The final EMTALA rule is due out within weeks. It's going to have significant implications for hospitals. In short, EMTALA governs the way hospitals have to manage patients coming into the emergency department, and how and when those patients can be transferred. Join us for a live 90-minute audioconference, "EMTALA Final Rule: New Strategies for Compliance" on July 14 beginning at 1 p.m. Eastern. Our speakers will dedicate half the program time to answering your questions. For information or to register, CLICK HERE, or call our customer service department at 800-650-6787. Be sure to mention Source Code EZ1401B.
May I withhold access to a patient's medical record because of a past due account? Q: A patient has an outstanding balance that he has not addressed, even though our billing department has contacted him many times. The patient recently exercised his right to obtain a copy of his medical record. Can we withhold the copy until the patient makes some sort of payment? We have always operated under the assumption that a provider cannot withhold a patient record until the patient pays his bill. Is this right? A: To read the answer to this question, click here.
Quick Survey
In order to bring you the most useful information, we're looking for feedback on how your organization manages its chargemaster. Take the survey, and to show our appreciation, we'll enter your name into a raffle. One lucky respondant will win $50. Click here to begin the chargemaster survey. Share the news! You've been benefiting from our informative
e-mail newsletter, so why not pass on this resource to your peers? Sign up
a colleague and get $20 off your next purchase on HCPro's
Healthcare Marketplace!
Send your comments and questions about Compliance Monitor Q&A to: Laura Motta |
Compliance Monitor (c) 2003 HCPro, Inc. You have permission to forward Compliance Monitor, in its entirety only, to your colleagues, provided this copyright notice remains part of your transmission. Better yet, send them to http://www.hcmarketplace.com/free/emailnls.cfm where they can subscribe to the newsletter directly. All other rights reserved. None of this material may be reprinted without the expressed written permission of HCPro, Inc.
DISCLAIMER Advice given is general, and readers should consult professional counsel for specific legal, ethical, or clinical questions. Users of this service should consult attorneys who are familiar with federal and state health laws.
SPONSORSHIPS For information about sponsoring Compliance Monitor, contact Margo Padios at mailto:mpadios@hcpro.com or call 781/639-1872, ext. 3145. If you would like further information about any of HCPro's products, including books, seminars, videos, consulting services, or newsletters please visit http://www.hcmarketplace.com
YOUR SUBSCRIPTION You are receiving this message as a subscriber to Compliance Monitor. If you would like to unsubscribe, please visit http://www.hcmarketplace.com/unsub.cfm?e=compliance-postings@hcpro.com If you do not have web access, please forward this email to: mailto:owner-compliance@hcpro.com and type "Remove compliance-postings@hcpro.com" in the body.
Copyright 2003 HCPro, Inc.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Searched

