EMTALA settlements raise the stakes for emergency departments
Compliance Monitor, May 7, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Two separate settlements in the last week have turned the spotlight on the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) and the delicate responsibilities of hospital emergency departments.
In Chicago, a jury awarded $12 million on May 1 to the family of a 15-year-old who bled to death after being shot while he played basketball near Advocate Ravenswood Hospital. The boy's friends dragged him to the hospital entrance, but a manager refused to allow a triage nurse to respond, citing a hospital policy that it could not treat patients outside the facility, according to the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin. According to the boy's attorney, police finally brought him inside, where he died two minutes later.
In a second case in Detroit, a jury awarded $5 million on May 2 to the family of a 33-year-old man who died in an ambulance after Bostford General Hospital transferred him to another hospital before stabilizing him, according to the Detroit Free Press. The man, Kelly Snider-Smith, was injured in a car accident and needed surgery, but the hospital's operating tables could not accommodate his weight, which was close to 600 pounds, according to a hospital spokesperson. The hospital transferred him to University of Michigan Hospital, but Smith died before he arrived.
EMTALA requires hospitals to stabilize patients before transferring them to another hospital. The law also requires hospitals to perform a screening exam, treat, or transfer a patient to a higher level of care when someone requests it on behalf of an injured person.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Searched
