Thousands of medical records leaked in California
Compliance Monitor, February 22, 2012
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
A glitch in the network security settings of five California hospitals allowed outside search engines to potentially access the private health data of thousands of patients, the health system discovered earlier this month.
The St. Joseph Health System in Orange, CA, reported on its website that it learned February 8 that its hospitals accidentally made PHI accessible to disclosure by allowing outside search engines to access certain files on its internal computer network. The information relates to patients who may have received services between February 2011 and August 2011, according to a press release from St. Jude Medical Center in Fullerton, CA, one of the five hospitals in the St. Joseph Health System.
The breach affected an estimated 30,000 patients, according to Healthcare Info Security’s February 17 report.
The data did not contain Social Security numbers, financial data, or addresses, but did possibly include patient names, lab results, demographic information, and diagnoses lists, according to the St. Jude press release.
St. Jude is providing identity theft protection services to its patients at no cost.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
-
Strategies for Health Care Compliance
News and real-life examples to increase the effectiveness of your compliance program. Strategies for Health Care Compliance...
-
Compliance Monitor
This HTML e-mail newsletter delivers news on Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse, as well as recent documents and targets...
-
Medicare Weekly Update
Each issue of Medicare Weekly Update includes the latest CMS proposed and final rules, CMS manual revisions, and...
-
Medicare Update for Physician Services
Medicare Update for Physician Services is a free, monthly e-zine that delivers news and information to help physician...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Searched