NC couple sentenced to 24 months for healthcare fraud and tax offenses
Compliance Monitor, July 13, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Ruben D. McLain, 40, and Michelle Judge McLain, 38, were each sentenced to 24 months in prison and three years of supervised release for healthcare fraud, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and tax evasion, according to a Department of Justice press release. The couple was also ordered to jointly pay $1.3 million to the Internal Revenue Service.
The McLains did business in Winston-Salem, NC, as Universal Services, Inc., Reynolds Home Care, and Triage Behavioral Health Systems. The companies provided Medicaid-covered personal care and mental health services to qualified recipients.
According to the DOJ, the McLains established a bank account for Universal Services, Inc., using a false tax identification number. They also used business bank accounts to purchase personal items for their home, to pay school tuition for their children, and to purchase jewelry.
The McLains pleaded guilty to submitting a false enrollment application to the North Carolina Division of Medical Assistance that concealed their involvement in the companies through the use of a nominee and a fictitious person. The McLains also pleaded guilty to withholding income, Social Security, and Medicare taxes from their employees’ wages without paying over those withholdings to the Internal Revenue Service.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Searched
