Quest agrees to California's largest false claims settlement
Compliance Monitor, May 25, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Quest Diagnostics, California’s largest provider of medical laboratory testing, will pay $241 million to settle claims that it overcharged the state's Medicaid program, according to a California Attorney General press release. The settlement is the largest recovery in the history of California's False Claims Act.
Whistleblower Chris Riedel and his company Hunter Laboratories, a Quest competitor, filed suit against Quest in 2005 alleging that Quest systematically overcharged the Medi-Cal program for more than 15 years. Quest also allegedly provided illegal kickbacks to doctors, hospitals, and clinics in exchange for referrals. Quest offered them lab tests at a low price, then charged Medi-Cal a higher price to make up the difference, according to the press release.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
-
Billing Alert for Long-Term Care
It's essential to know how to correctly submit your Medicare claims in order to get the reimbursement your facility...
-
Strategies for Health Care Compliance
News and real-life examples to increase the effectiveness of your compliance program. Strategies for Health Care Compliance...
-
Compliance Monitor
This HTML e-mail newsletter delivers news on Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse, as well as recent documents and targets...
-
Coding and Billing for Outpatient Rehab Made Easy:
Take the confusion out of coding and billing for outpatient rehab and ensure you receive accurate reimbursement for the...
-
Stark Law, 2nd edition: A user's guide to achieving compliance
This updated version of HCPro's Stark Law best seller, first published in 2005—and now co-authored by former CMS Stark...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Searched