Ohio pharmaceutical company pays $8 million to resolve kickback allegations
Compliance Monitor, April 27, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Cardinal Health Inc. agreed to pay $8 million to resolve claims that it violated the False Claims Act by making payments to induce referral orders for its prescription drugs, in violation of the anti-kickback statute, according to a Department of Justice press release.
A former pharmacy owner, R. Daniel Saleaumua, and a pharmacy consultant, Kevin Rinne, filed the case against the Dublin, OH–based pharmaceutical distributor under the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act. Saleaumua alleged that Cardinal paid him $440,000 in exchange for an agreement that he purchase prescription drugs from Cardinal for his pharmacies. Together, Saleaumua and Rinne will receive $760,000 as their share of the government’s recovery.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
-
Billing Alert for Long-Term Care
It's essential to know how to correctly submit your Medicare claims in order to get the reimbursement your facility...
-
Clinical Documentation Improvement
Hospitals are undoubtedly aware of how a quality clinical documentation improvement program can benefit their facility, but...
-
The Postacute Care Transfer Rule and Patient Status
During this two hour audio conference, Gloryanne Bryant will use case scenarios to help you increase your understanding of...
-
Observation Services: Assign Proper Level of Care to Prevent Denials
During this two-hour audio conference, our expert speaker reviews level of care regulations, addresses medical necessity...
-
Stark Law, 2nd edition: A user's guide to achieving compliance
This updated version of HCPro's Stark Law best seller, first published in 2005—and now co-authored by former CMS Stark...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Searched