Medicaid managed care plan pays $26 million to settle false claims charges
Compliance Monitor, February 9, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
CareSource, CareSource Management Group Co., and CareSource USA Holding Co. have agreed to pay the United States and the state of Ohio $26 million to resolve allegations that they caused Medicaid to pay for assessments and case managements they did not provide, according to a Department of Justice (DOJ) press release.
CareSource provides managed care benefits to Medicaid beneficiaries in Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan. Between January 2001 and December 2006, CareSource entities allegedly failed to provide required screening, assessment, and case management for beneficiaries with special healthcare needs, and allegedly received Medicaid funds to which they were not entitled. The CareSource entities also allegedly submitted false data to the state of Ohio so it appeared they were providing the required services.
Laura Rupert and Robin Herzog, former CareSource employees, filed a suit against CareSource on behalf of the United States. The False Claims Act’s qui tam provision allows private persons to file fraud suits on behalf of the United States and share in any recovery. Rupert and Herzog will receive approximately $3.1 million for their efforts.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Searched
