Medical clinic owner and VP sentenced to prison for $23 million Medicare fraud scheme
Compliance Monitor, December 22, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Bernice Brown, 56, the owner of a Detroit-area physical therapy clinic, and Daniel Smorynski, 63, the clinic’s vice president, were sentenced to 151 months and 108 months in prison, respectively, for their roles in a $23 million Medicare fraud scheme, according to a Department of Justice (DOJ) press release.
U.S. District Court Judge Arthur Tarnow also sentenced Brown and Smorynski to three years of supervised release and ordered them to pay jointly and severally $6.5 million in restitution.
Brown and Smorynski worked for Wayne County Therapeutic Inc. (WCT), which purported to specialize in physical and occupational therapy. According to the DOJ, Brown purchased fake physical and occupational therapy files that were created by non-enrolled, and in many cases, non-licensed contractor therapists. The contractor therapists paid Medicare beneficiaries cash kickbacks in exchange for their Medicare numbers and signatures on false documentation to make it appear as if they received therapy.
According to the DOJ, Brown and Smorynski used the false documents to bill services to Medicare as if WCT therapists had provided the services. Brown also instructed her staff to create false documents to make it appear that WCT therapists, who were licensed in the state and enrolled with Medicare, had performed the services, when she knew they had not. Smorynski aided in the submission of claims for services he knew WCT did not provide, according to the DOJ.
Between approximately October 2002 and September 2006, Brown and Smorynski submitted approximately $23.2 million in claims to Medicare for physical and occupational therapy services that were never provided. Medicare paid approximately $6.5 million of those claims.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Searched
