Speech therapists and three Idaho hospitals pay $2.425 million to settle healthcare fraud lawsuit
Compliance Monitor, December 8, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Two speech therapists, Matthew Stevens and Michelle Dahlberg, and three hospitals in Eastern Idaho agreed to pay $2.425 million to settle healthcare fraud allegations, according to a Department of Justice (DOJ) press release.
Beginning in 2001, Dahlberg and/or Stevens and their businesses allegedly used unqualified aides to deliver speech therapy services to outpatients of Eastern Idaho Regional Medical Center, Madison Memorial Hospital, and Idaho Falls Recovery Center. Those services were then inappropriately billed to Medicaid as licensed speech therapy services, according to the DOJ.
Jennifer Putnam filed the lawsuit under the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act. Putnam will receive approximately $364,000.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
-
Healthcare Life Safety Compliance
Learn Life Safety Code tips and interpretations for healthcare facilities with this in-depth monthly resource.
-
Strategies for Health Care Compliance
News and real-life examples to increase the effectiveness of your compliance program. Strategies for Health Care Compliance...
-
Compliance Monitor
This HTML e-mail newsletter delivers news on Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse, as well as recent documents and targets...
-
The Compliance Officer's Handbook, 2nd Edition
This revised edition is packed with even more practical tools, case studies, tips and tools, sample audits, and sample...
-
Stark Law, 2nd edition: A user's guide to achieving compliance
This updated version of HCPro's Stark Law best seller, first published in 2005—and now co-authored by former CMS Stark...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Searched