Other Issuances: OIG reviews excessive outpatient claims, and more
Medicare Weekly Update, May 18, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medicare Weekly Update!
OIG audits excessive outpatient claims
On May 3, the OIG issued an audit report in which it found that for calendar years 2004 through 2007, all of Swedish Medical Center – Cherry Hill billed incorrect claims resulting in overpayments totaling approximately $103,000. The OIG determined that:
- For four claims, Cherry Hill billed for a replacement device without the required FB modifier and applicable condition codes
- For two claims, Cherry Hill billed for an injection of reteplase rather than an application of a small dose for cleaning catheters
- For one claim, Cherry Hill billed for a replacement device rather than a pacing lead
- For one claim, Cherry Hill billed for a service provided to a research study patient that should not have been billed to Medicare
OIG issues report on interrupted stays at IPFs
On May 4, the OIG issued a nationwide review of Medicare payments for interrupted stays at inpatient psychiatric facilities (IPF). Based on a sample of 100 claims, the OIG estimated that Medicare fiscal intermediaries made $3.9 million in improper payments to IPFs nationwide in calendar years 2006 and 2007 for claims on behalf of beneficiaries who had been discharged from another IPF within the prior 3 days. To discourage inappropriate discharges and readmissions to IPFs, CMS has established a 3-day policy for interrupted stays. An interrupted stay occurs when a beneficiary is discharged from an IPF and admitted to the same or a different IPF within 3 consecutive days. In such a case, the “readmission” is considered a continuation of the initial stay.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medicare Weekly Update!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Searched
