Device manufacturer pays FDA $296M for not reporting safety issues
Compliance Monitor, April 7, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Medical device manufacturer Guidant LLC pleaded guilty in a US District Court in St. Paul, MN, for violating the FDA regulations by not reporting faulty implantable cardioverter defibrillators, according to a Department of Justice press release.
The defibrillator monitors the electrical activity of a patient’s heart and sends an electrical shock to the heart when it detects any abnormal pattern. Any malfunction or operating failure can result in sudden death. In its guilty plea, Guidant admitted to making a false statement in a required submission to the FDA and failed to notify the agency of a correction Guidant made to the device in an attempt to reduce its health risk.
Guidant’s criminal penalty of $296 million is the largest penalty ever imposed on a device manufacturer for violating the FDA’s regulations.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
-
Strategies for Health Care Compliance
News and real-life examples to increase the effectiveness of your compliance program. Strategies for Health Care Compliance...
-
Compliance Monitor
This HTML e-mail newsletter delivers news on Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse, as well as recent documents and targets...
-
Medicare Weekly Update
Each issue of Medicare Weekly Update includes the latest CMS proposed and final rules, CMS manual revisions, and...
-
Medicare Update for Physician Services
Medicare Update for Physician Services is a free, monthly e-zine that delivers news and information to help physician...
-
Stark Law, 2nd edition: A user's guide to achieving compliance
This updated version of HCPro's Stark Law best seller, first published in 2005—and now co-authored by former CMS Stark...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Searched