Note: CMS provides guidance on voluntary use of ABNs
Medicare Weekly Update, December 1, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medicare Weekly Update!
Editor’s note: Judith Kares, JD, CPC, regulatory specialist for HCPro, Inc., is the author of this week’s note from the instructor.
In a recent transmittal (R1840CP), CMS provides guidance on the voluntary use of ABNs. ABNs are prescribed forms of liability notification that are provided to beneficiaries prior to the delivery of outpatient services in circumstances where the provider believes that Medicare will deny coverage, resulting in beneficiary liability for those services. Prior notice is generally mandatory when the provider expects Medicare to deny coverage for any of the following reasons:
- The services do not meet Medicare’s medical necessity guidelines for those services;
- The services are screening services that are being provided more frequently than Medicare provides a benefit for; or
- The services are custodial in nature.
Click over to the MedicareMentor Blog to read more.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medicare Weekly Update!
Related Products
-
Billing Alert for Long-Term Care
It's essential to know how to correctly submit your Medicare claims in order to get the reimbursement your facility...
-
Strategies for Health Care Compliance
News and real-life examples to increase the effectiveness of your compliance program. Strategies for Health Care Compliance...
-
Compliance Monitor
This HTML e-mail newsletter delivers news on Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse, as well as recent documents and targets...
-
Medicare Weekly Update
Each issue of Medicare Weekly Update includes the latest CMS proposed and final rules, CMS manual revisions, and...
-
Medicare Update for Physician Services
Medicare Update for Physician Services is a free, monthly e-zine that delivers news and information to help physician...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Searched