New Stark law regulations loom over healthcare professionals
Compliance Monitor, September 30, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Significant changes to the federal Physician Self-Referral Law, or Stark Law, will take effect October 1, creating potential compliance liabilities for physicians and hospitals, reports the American Medical News (AMN).
CMS proposed the changes to the Stark Law, considered to be one of the most complex regulations in healthcare, in the 2009 IPPS final rule. CMS will eliminate:
• “Under arrangement” contracts, in which hospitals contract with physician-owned entities to provide ancillary services
• Per use or “per-click” payments for equipment and space leases
• Compensation deals based on percentage of revenue generated by space or equipment use
Unlike other liability statues, Stark law violations do not depend on a physician’s intent to defraud. “Stark is a strict-liability statute. So even if you have the most innocent of intentions, you are still subject to the grossest of penalties, as if you meant to violate the law,” said Lawrence W. Vernaglia, Esq., co-chair of Foley & Lardner LLP’s national healthcare payments, fraud and abuse, and compliance work group.
Under the new rule, CMS will consider physicians to have a direct ownership stake in the designated health services they provide, basically eradicating referrals unless they comply with Stark’s stricter ownership exceptions, reports AMN.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: HIPAA-compliant phone messages
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Physician referral patterns ripe for scrutiny
- Dealing with data breaches
- Sneak Peek: Planning for homecare can reduce avoidable readmissions
- Ask the expert: Should medical staff bylaws address employment contracts and exclusive contracts?
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Nurse pleads guilty to Medicare fraud
- Q/A: New device pass-through categories
- Featured webcast: Assessing the competence of low- and no-volume practitioners
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: HIPAA-compliant phone messages
- Ask the expert: Should medical staff bylaws address employment contracts and exclusive contracts?
- Sneak Peek: Planning for homecare can reduce avoidable readmissions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Featured webcast: Assessing the competence of low- and no-volume practitioners
- To sign or not to sign
- Bill and charge for supplies correctly to reduce risk and minimize lost revenue
- Blanket Warmers, What Is Safe?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Searched
