Q&A: Are all hospital acquired conditions (HACs) also 'never-events'?
Compliance Monitor, May 13, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Q: Are all hospital acquired conditions (HACs) also “never-events”?
A: Although there is some overlap, not all HACs are never events, says Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC, director of Medicare and compliance at HCPro, Inc., in Marblehead, MA.
“People often get these confused and assume that the hospital-acquired conditions are never events. [HACs] are just reasonably preventable events,” she says. “You can’t prevent every single infection.”
Gennady Beyzarov, MBA, CICA, performance data analyst at Lourdes Hospital in Binghamton, NY, considers one an extension of the other. “A never event is actually a subsidiary of a hospital-acquired condition. It has to be hospital-acquired to be a never event.”
A never event is more serious than a HAC, says Beyzarov.
Although the two lists are different, the following five HACs are also considered never events:
-
Retained foreign object after surgery (e.g., leaving a sponge in a patient)
-
Air embolism
-
Injuries related to falls and traumatic events such as electric shock and burns
-
Blood incompatibility
-
Stage III and IV pressure ulcers
“Clearly, the two lists overlap, but they’re not the same. Those three [wrong-site surgery] never events are not on the HAC list. They are just categorically different,” Hoy says. “The HACs are still considered covered services, whereas those three never events are never covered.”
This question and answer is adapted from the article “Understand how never events, HACs differ” which appears in the May 2009 issue of the HCPro newsletter Healthcare Auditing Strategies.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
