IA senator wants CMS to respond to DMEPOS problem
Compliance Monitor, April 22, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
On April 17, Senator Chuck Grassley issued a public letter to CMS calling for the agency to respond to a recent OIG report that identified millions in Medicare overpayments to durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) suppliers.
In the letter, Grassley said the medical device suppliers and other related businesses owe Medicare $352 million for 2005 and $402 million for 2006, but CMS has no mechanism in place to recover the money.
Grassley also expressed concern with a “possible systemic vulnerability” in the enrollment and oversight of DMEPOS suppliers.
Grassley closed the letter with three questions for CMS:
1. When a potential DMEPOS supplier or home health agency applies to participate in the Medicare program, are they required to disclose any relationship with other companies currently in default to the Medicare program?
2. What policies are in place to recoup losses after a default, and if so please provide copies?
3. What enhanced authorities does CMS require to protect the program?
2. What policies are in place to recoup losses after a default, and if so please provide copies?
3. What enhanced authorities does CMS require to protect the program?
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Searched
