Make Stark compliance a priority this year
Strategies for Health Care Compliance, April 1, 2009
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Strategies for Health Care Compliance.
Upcoming changes to the Stark Law should put financial arrangement audits at the top of compliance officers? and auditors? priority lists this year. Provisions to the Stark Law will be effective October 1. Major changes include: The elimination of unit-of-service or per-click payments for a physician who leases space and equipment to a provider who performs designated health services (DHS) for patients referred by the physician lessor. The expansion of CMS? definition of an entity that is furnishing DHS to include the person or entity that has performed services billed as DHS or presented a claim for Medicare benefits for the DHS. The prohibition of percentage-based compensation for office space and equipment, except for physician services. This year?s inpatient prospective payment system final rule amends the previous exception for office space and equipment rental and fair market value compensation and indirect compensation arrangements.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Strategies for Health Care Compliance.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Searched
