FTC extends deadline for "Red Flags Rule"
Healthcare Auditing Weekly, October 28, 2008
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has extended the deadline to implement the “Red Flags Rule” until May 1, 2009, giving creditors and financial institutions more time to develop and set up identity theft programs, according to an FTC press release.
The rule requires financial institutions and creditors, including non-profit hospitals, to develop and implement written identity theft prevention programs, as part of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions (FACT) Act of 2003. The programs must identify, detect, and respond to patterns, practices, or specific activities—known as “red flags”—that could indicate identity theft, according to the FTC’s Web site.
Originally, the rule was set for November 1, 2008. However, the FTC discovered many industries and entities affected by this rule were uncertain about the rule. Some indicated they were not aware they were under the FTC’s jurisdiction until it was too late to comply with the November deadline.
Comments
1 comments on “FTC extends deadline for "Red Flags Rule" ”
- Jumiiee (3/14/2012 at 7:59 PM)
- This is a very serious ovtlaiion. Anyone who violates this law can and will be thrown in jail. Anyone who works in the health care field should be aware of HIPPA and know what the consequences are for violating it. They mean business and a hospital gets fined $1 million. That should be enough to get everyone aware of what happens. Great post!!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Searched
