OIG: Medicare overstated fraud recoveries
Healthcare Auditing Weekly, August 26, 2008
Medicare allegedly instructed outside auditors ignore government policies designed to accurately report fraud and as a result, the agency’s claim of preventing millions of dollars in fraud in 2006 are misleading, according to a New York Times article.
In a draft report reviewed by the Times, the OIG said one-third of spending for wheelchairs, oxygen supplies, and other medical equipment for fiscal year 2006 was improper. The report estimates the fraud totaled approximately $2.8 billion. In its report to Congress, CMS said it reduced the amount of durable medical equipment (DME) fraud to $700 million.
CMS hired AdvanceMed, a subsidiary of Computer Sciences Corporation, to audit Medicare DME spending. According to the Times, CMS officials told AdvanceMed to ignore an auditing protocol required by law. Instead of randomly selecting and comparing invoices to physicians’ records, auditors were allegedly instructed to only examine the invoices from DME suppliers.
Medicare introduced a competitive bidding program to help control costs and decrease fraud. Congress suspended the program, that was originally effective July 1.
The report, expected to be released this week, is still in draft form and the findings may be changed or edited by the OIG, the Times reported.
Comments
0 comments on “OIG: Medicare overstated fraud recoveries ”
Related Products
-
Strategies for Health Care Compliance
News and real-life examples to increase the effectiveness of your compliance program. Strategies for Health Care Compliance...
-
Compliance Monitor
This HTML e-mail newsletter delivers news on Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse, as well as recent documents and targets...
-
Medicare Weekly Update
Each issue of Medicare Weekly Update includes the latest CMS proposed and final rules, CMS manual revisions, and...
-
Medicare Update for Physician Services
Medicare Update for Physician Services is a free, monthly e-zine that delivers news and information to help physician...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Searched