Note from Hugh
Medicare Weekly Update, August 19, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medicare Weekly Update!
Last week was a relatively light week on the regulatory front with one significant exception. As reported below, last week CMS issued a proposed rule on the replacement of ICD-9-CM with ICD-10-CM (diagnosis codes) and ICD-10-PCS (procedure codes) effective October 1, 2011. Over the years, we have had numerous false starts on the implementation of ICD-10. So, it remains to be seen whether the proposed rule will really be finalized and, if so, whether the implementation date will remain October 1, 2011.
If this really is the beginning of the implementation process of ICD-10, hospitals should not underestimate the operational implications. ICD-10 is much more that an enhancement of ICD-9-CM. Rather, ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS are completely different coding systems from ICD-9-CM. Computer systems will need significant reprogramming and hospital staff will need extensive retraining. Many people remember the operational challenges presented by the so-called “Y2K” transition. In my view, Y2K was a “walk in the park” compared to the challenges that will be presented by the implementation of ICD-10. We should all review the proposed rule carefully, submit comments as appropriate, and keep a close eye on this process.

Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medicare Weekly Update!
Comments
0 comments on “Note from Hugh ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Searched
