Another insurer joins the list of those refusing to pay for 'never events'
Compliance Monitor, July 23, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City became the latest health insurer to announce it will no longer cover medical costs that result from certain preventable errors.
Several private insurers, including CIGNA, WellPoint, and Aetna, made similar statements after Medicare announced, in August 2007, it would stop paying for eight preventable complications, also known as “never events” starting on October 1, 2008. Medicare expanded the list in April by proposing the addition of nine more “never events” to the list.
In addition to private insurers refusing to pay for never events, hospitals in Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Washington have agreed not to charge for all never events. Hospitals in other states have agreed not to charge for some never events.
According to an article in the Kansas City Star, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City will use the same list of “never events” Medicare is planning to use.
The proposed complications no longer covered by Medicare include:
-
Sudden artery blockage, or embolism, from air bubbles introduced during surgery.
-
Objects left inside a patient during surgery
-
Use of the wrong blood type during transfusions
-
Urinary tract infections associated with catheters
-
Pressure ulcers (bed sores)
-
Infections from central vein catheters
-
Mediastinitis, an often fatal surgical-site infection of lung tissue
-
Hospital-acquired injuries, such as fractures, dislocations, head and crushing injuries, and burns
This list could change before the October 1 implementation date, and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City said it will change its list if Medicare adds or removes any never events from its list.
To read the full article, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Comments
0 comments on “Another insurer joins the list of those refusing to pay for 'never events' ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Searched
