Dead doctors bill Medicare for an estimated $92 million
Compliance Monitor, July 16, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
On July 9, the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations estimated between $60.3 million and $92.8 million worth of Medicare payments were issued to companies that used the Unique Physician Identification Numbers (UPIN) of deceased doctors. Furthermore, 63% of the claims the committee identified as being billed by deceased doctors occurred after CMS implemented changes to stop such abuse from occurring.
According to the report, CMS does not deny these abuses and has taken steps to further prevent abuse from occurring. Most recently, CMS terminated the UPIN system and replaced it with a new National Provider Identifier (NPI) number system for all Medicare providers. The new NPI numbers have been required for Medicare claims since May.
During testimony before the committee, Herb Kuhn, Deputy Administrator of CMS, said he believes the NPI system will reduce the likelihood of deceased doctors billing Medicare in the future because NPIs will be cross-referenced with Social Security records to make sure doctors with registered NPIs are not deceased.
In his testimony, Robert Vito, Regional Inspector General for Evaluation and Inspections, stated the new NPI system is still vulnerable to abuse and CMS must conduct post payment reviews that will identify:
- When there are spikes in the use of a particular NPI
- When the NPI is consistently associated with an aberrant number of claims
- When the NPI used on claims is not in the geographic vicinity of the beneficiary
To read the testimony from the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations hearing, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Comments
0 comments on “Dead doctors bill Medicare for an estimated $92 million ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Searched
