Note from Hugh
Medicare Weekly Update, March 18, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medicare Weekly Update!
CMS conducted a Hospital Open Door Forum conference call last Thursday. A number of important operational issues were discussed. If you missed the call, you should try to catch the "encore" (i.e., recorded) version. It is available at no charge through tomorrow (Wednesday, April 19). Dial 800-642-1687 and enter 33267865 as the conference ID.
One issue that was discussed on the call was the so-called "medically unlikely edits" or "MUEs." The MUEs are a set of edits maintained by CMS's National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) contractor. They are designed to "edit out" outpatient services when the units of service billed seem to be "medically unlikely."
The MUEs have been controversial because, unlike the NCCI edits, CMS has not publicly released the MUE edits. However, the January 2008 update to the HCPCS Level II file added the following new modifier:
- GD: Units of service exceeds medically unlikely edit value and represents reasonable and necessary services
Interestingly, CMS has issued no guidance (or at least none that I can find) on when or how this modifier should be used. On last week's Hospital Open Door Forum conference call, a caller noted that her hospital had attempted to override MUE edits applicable to certain injection/infusion services with the new -GD modifier but the modifier did not appear to override the edits. The caller asked whether CMS would recognize the -GD modifier or issue a transmittal regarding its use. CMS responded that it would contact the caller to follow-up on this issue.
Where does this leave hospitals? First, we all need to be on lookout for guidance from CMS on the -GD modifier. In the meantime, hospitals will need to contact their local Fiscal Intermediary or Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) for guidance on the use of this new modifier. 
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medicare Weekly Update!
Comments
0 comments on “Note from Hugh ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Searched
