Oregon hospitals to stop charging for never events
Compliance Monitor, March 12, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Oregon is the latest state to decide to stop charging for preventable medical errors, according to a press release from the Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems (OAHHS).
All 57 Oregon hospitals will no longer charge for costs connected to preventable medical errors, known as never events, if an investigation by the hospital determines the error was avoidable.
Never events range from surgery on the wrong body part to foreign objects being left in a patient after surgery. Under the guidelines, Oregon hospitals will not seek payment for additional charges directly resulting from an event if:
- The event results in an increased length of stay, level of care, or significant intervention
- An additional procedure is required to correct an event in the previous procedure
- An unintended procedure is performed
- Re-admission is required as a result of an event that occurred in that same facility
A complete list of qualifying preventable medical errors is included in the policy.
Medicare announced in August 2007 that it would stop paying for preventable medical errors in October 2008. Since then four states-Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Washington-have agreed to waive fees for all never events. Other states have agreed to not charge for some never events.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Comments
0 comments on “Oregon hospitals to stop charging for never events ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Searched
