Two NJ companies settle Medicare fraud allegations
Healthcare Auditing Weekly, March 11, 2008
Two New Jersey-based companies agreed to million-dollar settlements to resolve allegations they defrauded Medicare, according to the Department of Justice (DOJ).
Besler & Company Inc.(BCI) and its principal, Philip Besler, and Cathedral Healthcare Systems Inc.(CHSI) wrongfully increased charges to make cases appear more costly and, thus, receive outlier payments from Medicare, the DOJ alleged.
Outlier payments are additional reimbursements Medicare pays to hospitals in cases where the cost of care is unusually high, enticing hospitals to treat high-cost patients.
BCI, a North Brunswick, N.J.-based consulting firm, agreed to pay almost $3 million after advising hospitals to improperly increase charges to Medicare between January 2001 and August 2003, according to a DOJ press release.
The agreement came just a day after CHSI, a Newark, N.J.-based hospital system, settled for more than $5.3 million to resolve similar allegations that occurred between January 1998 and August 2003, according to a DOJ release. CHSI also entered into a corporate integrity agreement with the OIG.
Three separate whistleblower lawsuits were brought against BCI and two against CHSI under the False Claims Act.
Comments
0 comments on “Two NJ companies settle Medicare fraud allegations ”
Related Products
-
Strategies for Health Care Compliance
News and real-life examples to increase the effectiveness of your compliance program. Strategies for Health Care Compliance...
-
Compliance Monitor
This HTML e-mail newsletter delivers news on Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse, as well as recent documents and targets...
-
Medicare Weekly Update
Each issue of Medicare Weekly Update includes the latest CMS proposed and final rules, CMS manual revisions, and...
-
Medicare Update for Physician Services
Medicare Update for Physician Services is a free, monthly e-zine that delivers news and information to help physician...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Searched