Senate panel reviewing False Claims Act Correction Act
Compliance Monitor, March 5, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Healthcare companies may find themselves in the odd position of siding with the Department of Justice (DOJ).
In testimony at last Wednesday's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the False Claim Act, the DOJ's Michael Hertz said the department did not support the False Claims Act Correction Act of 2007 in its current form. Hertz said the False Claims Act has been "an extremely effective weapon in the government's fight against fraud and we see no pressing need for major amendments at this time."
Senate Judiciary Committee chairperson Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), on the other hand, said the bill would correct judicial interpretation problems and strengthen the False Claims Act.
More than 600 false claims cases are still pending against healthcare and drug companies, and 150 of those involve overcharging the government for pharmaceuticals, according to Leahy's remarks.
In September 2007, Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Senator Richard Durbin (D-Ill) sponsored the False Claims Act Correction Act of 2007.
If passed, the new law would:
- Remove the requirement that false claims be presented to a government employee
- Clarify the dismissal of parasitic claims filed based upon publicly disclosed information
- Clarify that false or fraudulent claims against non-U.S. Government funds under the trust and control of the U.S. government are subject to recovery under the FCA
- Clarify when a government employee may act as a qui tam relator under the FCA
- Amend the statute of limitations in FCA cases
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Comments
0 comments on “Senate panel reviewing False Claims Act Correction Act ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Searched
