Note from Hugh
Medicare Weekly Update, February 26, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medicare Weekly Update!
In the February 12 edition of the Medicare Weekly Update, I commented on CMS's recent FAQ relating to the application of the CPT critical care bundling guidelines to hospitals. I noted that, as announced during the January 31 Hospital Open Door Forum conference call, CMS is now taking the position that hospitals may not separately bill for services identified by the CPT Manual as included in critical care when the additional services were provided in conjunction with critical care services.
Several readers have contacted HCPro regarding this issue. In general, our readers seem interested in learning whether other hospitals have operationalized the critical care bundling guidelines. One reader told us bluntly that her hospital has "not changed our billing of critical care."
While one could certainly complain about the way CMS implemented this change (i.e., through a FAQ and the Hospital Open Door Forum conference call, rather than through some more formal means), it seems clear to me that CMS expects hospitals apply the critical care bundling guidelines to all outpatient claims involving critical care services. Among other things, this means that hospitals should have reconfigured their internal "claims scrubbers" to apply the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edits to all critical care claims, even though Medicare's Outpatient Code Editor does not apply the NCCI Evaluation and Management Services edits to hospital claims.
If your hospital has not yet made this change, you should discuss this issue with your compliance department and/or legal counsel. It would not surprise me if the enforcement authorities take the position that a hospital's failure to "edit out" services included in the critical care bundling edits constitutes improper billing subject to sanctions, including the Civil False Claims Act. 
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medicare Weekly Update!
Comments
0 comments on “Note from Hugh ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched
