Settlement agreements related to psychiatric services
Compliance Monitor, January 10, 2000
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Two separate cases in which there were Medicaid fraud allegations related to psychiatric services-one involving a hospital, the other, a psychologist-were recently settled in Massachusetts. Jewish Memorial Hospital and Rehabilitation Center of Boston agreed to pay $285,000, perform community service, and follow "tough" compliance initiatives to resolve past billing problems, said Tom Reilly, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. According to Reilly, Jewish Memorial Hospital reportedly discovered, through an internal audit, that previous billing employees had "whited out" certain diagnostic codes on billing forms and improperly replaced them with reimbursement codes before submitting the bills to Medicaid, Reilly said. Allegedly, the employees acted on orders from previous hospital managers, Reilly reported. Jewish Memorial was not eligible to bill Medicaid for psychiatric hospitalizations because the hospital was not part of the statewide network overseen by the Massachusetts Behavioral Health partnership, a managed care company that coordinates treatment for members with mental health and substance abuse diagnoses, Reilly said. Reilly reported that the investigation involving the billings is still ongoing.
The second case related to charges of improper psychiatric claims allegedly involving psychologist Lionel Lyon of Newton, MA, who recently settled allegations of Medicaid fraud involving special education testing, Reilly said. According to Reilly, Lyon agreed to pay $275,000 in restitution and damages to settle charges that he and his company, The Adult and Child Consultation Center, double billed for the special education testing of Medicaid-eligible public school children. In addition, Reilly charged Lyon with an excessive battery of tests that were conducted per day. Lyon admitted to no wrongdoing in the settlement agreement, Reilly said.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Code changes should help ease the pain when coding for facet joint injections
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Searched
